Monday, June 16, 2014

Goff Brook road bridge (Middlesex Tpke/Old Main St)

How many times do we pass something every day and never pay it any attention? How often have we passed by a demolition site of an old factory, for example, and think "ARGH! I always meant to get a photo of that!" - and now it's too late. Hopefully, it only happens to you once or twice before you learn your lesson and get your photos when you can.  Unfortunately for many of us, we're still learning that lesson.

That's when historical research can really help fill the gaps.  I - as well as my friend John Wallace - rode/drove over the Old Main Street bridge over Goff Brook in Rocky Hill dozens, if not hundreds, of times. Unfortunately, neither of us got a photo of the bridge before it was recently rebuilt.  Here's what it looks like today (scroll to the bottom of the post), but what did it look like in 1947?  Nobody knows for sure - at least nobody I've talked to so far.

Earlier this year, I'd contacted our state DOT in hopes that they had some historical photos of the bridge (since it used to be the Middlesex Turnpike and the main road between Hartford and Old Saybrook), or at least a photo of it before it was rebuilt.  They directed me to the Town of Rocky Hill since, now downgraded to local road status, the town would have done any upgrading. So last week I finally got around to checking with the Rocky Hill Public Works Department - and got a little breakthrough.

The department head was actually on his way out for the day when I caught him, but he was intrigued with my project (after being initially concerned why I wanted such information) and - best of all - he said he'd taken a photo of the bridge before they started the repair work.  He assured me that "only from the deck up was done" and that "the deck and abutments are about 90 years old."

Yesterday, he emailed me the photo he took . . .




While all I can be sure of is that this is how the bridge looked as of April 17, 2008, unless/until I get any additional photographic evidence to the contrary, I'll assume this is how it looked in 1947 (but without those modern guardrails, natch).  JohnW, for his part, said he expects this is what it looked like - and that's good enough for me, for now.

But that won't keep me from following up on just one more lead - a fellow at the Rocky Hill Historical Society who I'm told has a "treasure trove" of Rocky Hill images.  Who knows, I may just be able to get an even older photo of this bridge after all. Of course, if you have - or know where I can get, an older photo, please let me know.

In the meantime, anybody have any ideas on what to use to model those cool railings?  Maybe some O scale steam locomotive stanchions?

Thursday, June 12, 2014

Backdrop Patching & Extending

One of the biggest mistakes I think I've made with this layout (so far) is with my backdrop and fascia.  While it won't be that big a problem elsewhere on the layout, in Wethersfield - an area that is relatively flat on the prototype - the backdrop is too high and the fascia is too low.  Consequently, I have to either include an un-prototypically steep slope to cover/join everything together, or I somehow have to extend things.  At this stage of construction, removing and redoing are decidedly not viable options.

Note to self - and to anyone else at the construction stage of a layout: make sure your backdrop extends below your subroadbed and that your fascia extends above your subroadbed.  Doing so will give you any flexibility you may need later.

For those of you, like me, that have discovered you need a lower backdrop or a higher fascia to flatten out your topography, here's how I did it. . .

First step was to hot glue some masonite backers to the bottom of the backdrop, as above. Another tip: you may want also to include a strip along the bottom of the backdrop, linearly along the joint/seam. While the backers will help align things, I think a backing strip all along the joint would have been even better.

 
Next, install your backdrop extension by butting the edge against the bottom of the backdrop and hot-gluing & clamping to the backers to hold it in place.


You can see the result above - not too bad.  The levels are there to show how (too) high the original backdrop was compared to the subroadbed - and to help me level things out for the installation of the rest of the support for Ballantine's and Wethersfield Lumber.


Here's the foam board, installed.  Jordan Lane will go between the ends of the sidings for Ballantine's (toward the back of the photo/"north") and Wethersfield Lumber (closer to you/"south") and head into the backdrop.  Without the backdrop extension in place, Jordan Lane would have to go up a steep hill and would look awful.


Here's a contemporary view of Jordan Lane, from trackside, looking west.  The building on the right is about where Ballantine's used to be and Wethersfield Lumber was on the left side of the street.  While you can barely perceive a slight upslope in the distance, it's overwhelmingly flat here.


As you travel south on the prototype, the topography gets a more pronounced slope from east (fascia) to west (backdrop) - which is helpful for my model.  Consequently, I decided to end the backdrop extension just north of Church Street (which passes just south of the Wethersfield station).  That foreground foamboard is the support for Gra-Rock Bottling, which sits just south of Church Street - and which, conveniently, has a bit of a hill behind it.  Not quite as steep as what I'll need to do here, but not too bad.


Here's the same area with some plastercloth and webbing done.  The slope is really apparent here.  That's a flat of the Gra-Rock building.
 

 
Final view of the Jordan Lane area, looking southwest, showing the silicone caulk joint filler.  I've since painted over this and it doesn't look great, but I'm planning on installing a photo backdrop over this entire seam to cover it up anyway.
 
What about fascia?  Well, it's nothing pretty, but it will do the job:
 
 
I needed to do this extension in order to provide a flat area for Church Street to come to the front/aisle.  I'll need to do something similar for Jordan Lane and Wells Avenue/Middlesex Turnpike.  This is what happens when you don't know enough to plan ahead of time where your streets are going to end up, and can cut your fascia accordingly.  But, as you can see, all is not lost and this doesn't require that you redo the fascia entirely.  I'm convinced (or at least hope) that once the scenery is in and the fascia is all painted that little "gotchas" like this will disappear - or at least not be so obvious to the operator.
 
 
I include the above photo as an example of a taping/topping job gone horribly wrong.  This is one of the joints/seams between two ends of masonite backdrop.  Problem is, I totally forgot to use tape on the joint before topping.  Then, instead of just taping & topping over it, I decided to try reopening the seam/joint and filling it with a bead of paintable latex silicone caulk.  I used this technique with much success in the corners of a room in our old house that had cracking plaster walls.  Took paint like a champ and looked great.
 
Not so here.  I don't know whether humidity was a factor, or if I didn't allow things to dry/cure long enough before re-painting, or what.  But this is what I have currently.  At least until I can figure out the best way to repair it.  I'm afraid that might require me to scrape all this off and start over.
 
I would LOVE to be told that's not the case and that you have a better idea. . . .
 
After I went through all the trouble of extending the backdrop -and installing a webbing/plastercloth slope further south (see the Gra-Rock photo above), I came across this photo:
 
Mark Olstyn's layout, photo posted in the Proto-Layouts yahoo group, msg 37185

Mark Olstyn and Marty McGuirk do scenery the way I hope to someday and the photo above is a great example of what I want my layout to look like eventually.  It's also a great example of an alternative to extending the backdrop as I did.

As you can see, it's a fairly flat scene and the backdrop isn't too far behind the track.  But most importantly, the bottom 4"(?) or so of the backdrop can't be seen - it's obscured by trees and brush.

Now, that may not work so well at the north end of Wethersfield at Jordan Lane, but it may be just the right approach for further south in town.  So I'm considering ripping out the webbing and plastercloth from around Church Street/Gra-Rock and redoing the topography as here.  The webbing would just go flat(tish) from the subroadbed toward the backdrop and then turn 90 degrees up to join the bottom of the backdrop.  I'd cover it all with plastercloth and Sculptamold and paint the "vertical" webbing/cloth/sculptamold a dark green/brown color to provide a backing for the underbrush and trees.

Something to consider, anyway.

Of course, any thoughts/suggestions/feedback on any of this is always MOST welcome!

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

New England Prototype Meet, Collinsville

So, now that it's been a week and a half (already?!) since the ProtoMeet, it's high time I post my report. But given it's getting to be old news by now, it'll be brief - light on the text, though heavy on the photos.

In short, I did a presentation, I bought some stuff, saw some fantastic modeling, and I met some great people.  The presentation was "A Day on the Valley Local" - essentially a slideshow I put together of what it would have been like to railfan/chase the local freight train in the late 1940s.  Even given the photo resources I have available, the train we "chased" wasn't the same one in every photo, but all the photos were from around the same time period, so I think it was pretty effective nonetheless.  What I'm most proud of though is that I was able to collect and convey so much information not only on the trains themselves, but on the people in the photos as well.  I think that really helped enrich the "journey" and IMO is one of the best reasons for doing all this research: to keep these folks alive, in a way, by preserving and perpetuating their memory.

As for what I bought - well, not all that much.  I'm at the stage in the hobby where I need time to build more than I need more stuff to build.  That said, I did get a few things...


I picked up this enginehouse as-is for 10 bucks.  I think it'll make a great stand-in for the old Billings & Spencer building (which was a warehouse for Hartford Rayon in 1947).


The building still stands in the Dividend section of Rocky Hill. Whattaya think?

I also picked up two second-hand Walthers transmission towers for a buck each.


I don't know if I really have room for them (even though they're severely undersized), or even if I do have room, whether I'll ultimately use them.  But for $2 they were worth getting just to try.


As you can see, Wethersfield did have these during my era.  I just need to decide whether to include them (maybe they'll just be represented on the backdrop?)


I also picked up these wheel masks to try out.  I built a home-made version from a block of wood, with slots cut in for the axles, but at this price I figured it was worth checking out.  Finally, I got a pack of Central Valley stairs & ladders - even less interesting than the wheel masks, so I won't even bother posting a photo.

While the vendors are always fun to visit and you can pick up some bargains, the ProtoMeet's main attractions for me are the modeling, the clinics, and the people I meet.

To introduce the "modeling" portion of my report, here's what I took to display:

Wethersfield Station (AMB kit), New Haven rebuilt wood boxcars (F&C and Westerfield), New Haven NE class caboose (NHRHTA/F&C)

I've always been intrigued by the St. Johnsbury & Lamoille County line in northern Vermont and have even come close to modeling it.  These 70-tonners would be a perfect way to start such a layout.

This display reminded me very much of my early railfan days at the B&M's East Deerfield Yard in the early 1980s.  A multi-unit lashup of these Bluebirds crossing the Deerfield River would be another great thing to model!

Heh - in keeping with what is turning out to be a gallery of "railroads I've considered modeling" - the Rutland was my first love, so I couldn't resist a shot of this beautifully done milk car.

You can just make out my diorama in the upper left corner of this shot, so you can see that this gorgeous NH Alco high-hood is right next door.  And very close to being, um, "adopted."  Good thing High Hoods weren't used on the Valley Local!

I shot this photo for two reasons: 1) the modeling is outstanding, and 2) while not precisely like anything on the line I'm modeling, it's exactly the sort of thing I want to be sure and include.  Certainly conveys the right look & feel, IMO.

(not so?) Obviously, this is not a model - but I wanted to be sure and include it if for no other reason than to give you a reason to visit Plainville, CT.  I had breakfast here with Randy & Joseph the second day of the 'meet.  Oh, and the NH's old Canal Line passes just to the left there - and goes north a few hundred yards to cross the old Highland Division, at-grade.  There's also a little yard north of the diamond where an ex-B&M Geep is stationed.  You know, if you need any other reason to visit Plainville.

You can always buy stuff at another train show, and you can see great modeling in the hobby press, but only at one of these meets do you get the opportunity to see and spend time with so many great folks in person. At the risk of being a little corny, I decided I'd try and get photos of as many of my hobby influences that I could - folks that I've either known for a long time, heard on model railroad podcasts, or just met this weekend.  And at the risk of being a little goofy, I decided to do these photos in a decidedly "internet friendly" way - by taking "selfies."  So here, in chronological order, are the selfies I shot.

Jim Lincoln had the honor misfortune of being my first target, but you can tell from his expression how excited he was about it!  I've heard him on Model Rail Radio and the Model Railcast podcasts for a while and just met him for the first time at the Big E show in January.  But I never got a photo with him - until now.

Dave Ramos was over at Randy's the previous day for an operating session.  I had the privilege to operate on Dave's New York Harbor Railroad a few months back - he models the same year I do (1947) but otherwise his layout, set in Manhattan, couldn't be further away from my design and concept..

Bill Schneider of O&W fame.  He lives just up the road from me and I'm glad I got to operate on his layout before he had to retire it.  He more than anyone else I know was able to accomplish on his layout what I hope to on mine, from concept to execution.  And I'm hoping he can help me with some scenery (hint, hint)!

Dave Owens - the Man Behind the NEProtoMeet.  He's the guy that makes it all happen, yes, with some help, but it's his baby.  We have him to thank for such a wonderful event.

Craig Bisgeier - the man with the best name (or at least the most invoked name on certain podcasts!).  Another huge influence, I've been following his Housatonic Railroad since the 1990s.

Tony Koester - Mr. Prototype Modeling, in my book at least.  I've loved his Trains of Thought column in Model Railroader for many years, but just recently discovered he wrote the ultimate essay about the Valley Line in "A Mogul at Middletown"  And his concept of Layout Design Elements was critical in helping me come up with my trackplan.

Bill Schaumburg of Railroad Model Craftsman.  His writing, especially in the "Perspectives" section of RMC, so often captured for me what I think a good model railroad does, which is to create the ultimate time machine.

Finally - and last only because it was literally the last selfie I took (and with only a few hours left of the 'meet itself) - Mike Rose.  Like Jim Lincoln, I've heard his voice on many model railroad podcasts over the years, but unlike Jim, I just this weekend got the chance to meet him.  Heh - he was so enthusiastic about meeting me that I'm certain he must have me confused with somebody else, but such warmth may just be another aspect of his great personality.  Even though his chosen era and locale is much different than mine, I really enjoy how he thinks through things and appreciate his ability to take us through his process.  And the fact that he's a cyclist too is just a bonus.

So that, in a HUGE nutshell (ok, maybe a coconut shell) is my report from the 2014 New England Prototype Modeler's Meet in Collinsville, CT.  Unfortunately, my job keeps me away from this meet every other year, so I won't be able to attend again until 2016.  Major bummer, but I'm already looking forward to it - hoping I'll have more info & photos to present and thinking about what I'll be able to bring to display.  Hope to see you there!

Wordless Wednesday #22





Monday, June 9, 2014

Some much, much better words about last week's Wordless Wednesday

As much as I enjoy sharing what I've learned through my research on the Valley Line, I must admit that I have an ulterior motive: I hope my sharing will elicit additional information and help me make the story of the line even more complete.

Along those lines (ahem), in my last post I put out a quick request for an old RMC article which I hoped not only that someone would have, but that they'd be willing to share it with me. Exceeding my expectations by a long shot, not 30 minutes after my post went live, I got an email from Trevor Marshall of Port Rowan fame - "Voila!" said he, and had attached a PDF of the article I was seeking. Thank you again Trevor!

But in keeping with my desire to share what I learn, I wanted to figure out the best way to share it with you - without stepping on any toes or violating any copyrights, etc. Very fortunately, last weekend at the ProtoMeet I had just seen Tony Koester and had met Bill Schaumburg. Turns out, Tony wrote the article in question, and Bill could give me permission to share it here - which he did, most graciously.

So, without any further ado, enjoy this great piece on one of the most famous photos of the Valley Local - "A Mogul at Middletown," by Tony Koester, published in Railroad Model Craftsman, May 1980 (courtesy RMC, via Trevor Marshall, used with permission).



Thursday, June 5, 2014

A few quick words about yesterday's Wordless Wednesday

Yeah, it was "cheating" - a little.  My unwritten rule is to use a "Wordless Wednesday" photo only once, and while technically I didn't use yesterday's photo in a WW post before, I did use it to compare to this photo (which was used for a WW post here):


As I explained before, this is - IMO - the most iconic photo of the Valley Local I know of and the first image I recall seeing of the line.  So modelgenic, this scene just demands to be recreated. 

Yesterday's WW photo is how the scene above looks today.  Trees are SO overrated....

The main reason for the "rerun," however, is related to something I heard at last weekend's ProtoMeet.  When I came to this image in my presentation, somebody mentioned that it had been the subject of a "Perspectives" or other editorial in Railroad Model Craftsman magazine at some point.  I would LOVE to see/read that, so if you have any idea when it appeared please let me know!

Speaking of the ProtoMeet, I hope to have my report on that wonderful weekend posted here soon!