Showing posts with label K-1 #466. Show all posts
Showing posts with label K-1 #466. Show all posts

Monday, September 11, 2017

A Few Words about Wordless Wednesday #186


The above photo looks innocuous enough, but there's actually "More to the Story...."

During the Summer of 1945, the New Haven reballasted the Valley Line from Hartford south to Middletown. Well, "ballast" is a bit of an overstatement - no traprock here, mostly gravel - but still better than what was on the line further south (which was lucky to have cinders, hardpack dirt, or sand). And here we see the Valley Local southbound on the main, led by K-1d mogul #466 (the regular #356 being down for boiler wash or other maintenance), passing the work train on the siding, led by J-1 class mikado #3014 with a string of ballast cars. Location is just south of the Mill Street crossing in South Wethersfield.

I thought at first it was a John Wallace photo (same look, resulting from the Brownie camera, usual era, and he's the one who sent it to me), but it turns out one of the crew from the ballast train actually took the photo using John's camera. John's actually the kid in white, watching the local go by. Ted Michalicki is on the fireman's seat of the 466 and Dave Corsair was still in the Army (the War was still going on), but would be back on the local in the Fall.

Despite his white duds, John fired the 3014 for most of that day - not too difficult given the light duty of ballast spreading. Len Buckley was the engineer on the J-1 and even let John run the train back to Hartford (it had to back up the whole way since the south switch of the South Wethersfield siding had been taken out and the engine couldn't do a run-around).

Also of note is the New Haven's distinctive flanger sign - a horizontal white board with two dots. Remarkably, it was that sign that initially caught my eye in this photo. It wasn't until asking John about it that all this other great info came out.

And now - thanks to John's excellent memory (not to mention his photo, no matter who actually took it) - you know "the rest of the story."

Saturday, March 22, 2014

Little River Bridge

There is a large stream that empties into the Connecticut River which forms the boundary between Middletown & Cromwell.  This stream was originally known as the Sebethe River and is today known as the Mattabesset River.  But in 1947, it was known as the Little River.

Kent Cochrane photo from the collection of Max Miller.
The above photo, which has been posted before on this blog, is from March, 1948 and shows K-1d #466 crossing the Little River southbound from Cromwell to Middletown.  As beautiful a railroad as the Valley Line is overall, there aren't many outstanding scenic highlights, so whenever there's a neat bridge scene - especially one for which I have a photo - from the era I'm modeling - I just have to recreate it in model form.  Bonus: That's John Wallace there holding down the fireman's seat (you can barely make him out).

Based on this photo, I decided that the (admittedly small) space between Middletown & Cromwell on my layout would include this scene.  Here's how that spot looks right now:

Middletown is off-photo to the left; Cromwell is off-photo to the right.  The line at the back along the wall is the north end of Middletown yard (left) and the line to E. Berlin (right).  My first (so far) Frog Juicer is on the back L-girder.
I'd originally planned on using one of those Micro-Engineering 30' deck girder bridges here, cutting out the subroadbed from the joint on the left to the riser on the right.  But looking at the Cochrane photo, I knew I'd at least need to change that plan to using one of the M-E 50' plate girder bridges.

And that was the plan.  Until today.

I cross the Little River twice every weekday on my commute.  Unfortunately, you can't see the railroad bridge from the highway, so I wanted to take a field trip up there on a day off to get some additional photos. I finally got the chance today, and here's what I saw:



As you can see, it's a LOT longer than I expected!  In addition to the two abutments, there are actually three intermediate piers, of two different types of construction.  And, as if that weren't enough, there are two short deck girder spans on each end between the abutments and the main bridge itself.

Heh - those 30' M-E bridge kits I have will come in handy after all: as mere approaches to the larger plate girder spans.  Go ahead - scroll up and look again at the amount of space I have for this scene.

Ugh.

Once I got over the initial shock & awe of meeting the Little River bridge in person, I decided at least to get a contemporary shot of that Cochrane photo from '48:


I should have gotten a little closer, but I was composing it from memory.  It's amazing how little has changed - except if you panned just slightly to the right, you'd see the Route 9 highway:


So I'm not quite sure now what my plan is for my model of the Little River Bridge area.  As if the shortage of space didn't complicate things enough, this whole area is on a curve where (as you can see) the prototype is straight.

This is yet another example of how doing a thorough job of field research early on is SOOOOO critical.  If I'd only known "then" (during the design phase) what I know now (and continue to discover), I may have done things differently.  But - thankfully - I really don't know exactly what I'd do differently.  I suppose I could have spread things out more, to provide more space for scenes.  But then something else would have had to go.  Planning a model railroad is all too often like pushing a balloon through a keyhole - "druthers" in one area become the "givens" of another.

But I suppose that's where the "art" of model railroading comes in.  At the end of the day, even the best & most skilled of us are impressionists by necessity and the most effective model railroads are those that convey the prototype best, even - or perhaps especially - through the artifice of sense and illusion.

Even if I removed the subroadbed all the way back to the risers, I'll only have about 15 inches to convey the Little River bridge scene.  But if I do a good job of selective compression, and my "artistic" skills are up to the task, that 15 inches may be just enough.

Here's hoping you'll stay tuned to see how I make out.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Choosing an Era: The End of Steam in the CT Valley

One of the first things you need to consider when modeling a prototype is what era you intend to model.  There's been much written about this topic by folks much more knowledgeable than I, but the consensus is that the narrower you define your era, the more plausible your efforts will be.  You don't want your steam locomotives pulling Penn Central boxcars, or modern automobiles set in a Victorian scene.

Defining your era can also be one of the most enjoyable research projects for your model railroad, especially if you're really into history.  Why else would it even occur to you what the proper colors of stop signs and mailboxes were in, say, 1947?  The answers to what "normal" folks would probably consider pretty esoteric questions are the puzzle pieces that make up the mosaic of time and place.  And the more questions you ask, and the more answers you get, the more effective you'll be at conveying that sense of time and place and the more convincing your "time machine" will be.

The "era puzzle" includes many pieces, one of the most important of which - on a model railroad at least - is what type of locomotives you include.  There's a reason why the so-called "Transition Era" between steam & diesel power is so popular - you (think you) can have your cake and eat it too and include both types.  But the limits of that era can vary pretty widely depending on your prototype.  And even when you've picked a prototype that includes what you want locomotive-wise, it may be hard to nail down exactly when those locomotives were last used.  That bit of information is essential to defining the outside limit of your era.

I definitely wanted to include steam engines on my representation of the New Haven Railroad's CT Valley line, so determining when steam power was last used is an essential piece of the puzzle for me.  The Valley line was only a lowly branch of a much larger system, so there'd be no fanfare or documentation of "Steam's Final Run" on the line.  I'd have to figure it out myself.  Here's the process I went (and am still going) through.  Hopefully my experience will inspire you to figure out that part of the puzzle for your own project. . .

With the delivery of Alco FAs and RS-2 roadswitchers, the Steam Era on the New Haven Railroad started to close rapidly and by the spring of 1949 diesels had taken over the Valley and Airline locals.  However, it's unclear when precisely the steam era ended in the Connecticut river valley.  Thankfully, railroads generally kept close track of their locomotive use, but the earliest NHRR Engine Assignment book I have is from April 24, 1949.  It shows the following:
  • Valley Local (HDX-7): DEY-3 (Alco S-1) #0947
  • Airline Local (HDX-12): DEY-5 (Alco S-2) #0606
  • Shoreline Local (PDX-2): DEY-5 (Alco S-2) #0612
(PDX-2 was the local freight between New London & Cedar Hill and at the time serviced the south end of the Valley line from Old Saybrook to East Haddam)

So we know steam had to end before 4/24/49.  What else can we deduce?  Well, based on photo evidence and the recollections of John Wallace (who "wrote the book" on the Valley Line - well, the articles at least, in the NHRHTA's Shoreliner magazine), we know that the most common engines used were K-1 class moguls on the Valley line and J-1 class mikados on the Airline.

According to John, K-1 #466 was the last mogul in use on the Valley line, supplanted by J-1s before the line was dieselized.  He should know - that's him holding down the fireman's box on the 466 below in March of 1948.


Valley Local southbound crossing the Little River from Cromwell to Middletown
Kent Cochrane photo from the Shoreliner Vol. 22 #4, p. 35
That narrows our "End of Steam in the Valley" to between March, 1948 and April, 1949.  But a year is still a pretty large window.  Now, here's an interesting image:

John Wallace collection.
This shows NHRR J-1 mikado #3011 on the Valley Local derailed at Belamose Avenue in Rocky Hill (Dividend), CT.  According to John Wallace, who recalls this derailment, it occurred sometime in 1948, but he wasn't sure when.  He's also pretty sure that this derailment spelled the end of steam engine service on the line, or was pretty close to it.  The snow on the ground says it's winter, but it is unlikely to be winter 1948 since we know K-1 moguls were still being used in March, 1948.  It could be as late as winter 1949, but no later since we know diesels were on-line by April '49.

You'd think the photographer - especially a photographer as meticulous as John - would know precisely when the photograph was taken.  But I just recently found out, even though it's in his collection, John's not the photographer(!).  Turns out, he got the photo from the Hartford Courant after he saw it printed in the paper.

Well now.

Every Thursday night, a bunch of us get together to catalog the NHRHTA's Photo Library for Shoreliner authors and other Association publications.  One of the guys that comes to help out is a professional researcher - Bob Belletzkie (of Tyler City Station fame.).  If the Courant printed the photo in the paper, there would be a date.  Using his research skills and digging through the archives, Bob found the article (actually only a photo and caption) and got the date for us: December 21, 1948.

So the end of steam on the Valley occurred sometime between December 21, 1948 and April 24, 1949.  I may never know the precise date of the last run of steam, but since I plan on modeling Autumn, I now know I can go as late as Autumn 1948.  Since I want to use moguls on the Valley local, the latest I can go is Autumn 1947.  And that's where I ended up.

But I'm still curious to know when the last steam ran, so if anybody has any additional information that could narrow that window of time further - most especially an Engine Assignment Book from before 4/24/49 - please let me know.

So that's the Valley line (so far...) - what about the Airline?  Looks like steam lasted there just a little longer.  Here's another Kent Cochrane photo, this one of the Airline local westbound at Middlefield, CT in April, 1948:

From the Shoreliner Vol. 22 #4 p. 31
And check out this photo John Wallace shot of the same local in the winter of 1949:


New Haven J-1 #3022 on the Airline Local eastbound at Rockfall, CT
And here's the same locomotive in Canaan, CT also in the "winter of 1949," according to Leroy Beaujon (who kindly loaned the photo):


New Haven J-1 #3022 at Canaan, CT.  Leroy Beaujon photo.
Did the 3022 leave the Airline temporarily and get put on a Canaan-area local before going back?  Seems unlikely, and until we get an earlier Engine Assignment book, we may not know for sure.  But we can draw a few inferences (assuming the photo captions are accurate).  "Winter of 1949" could technically mean anything from December 1948 through February 1949 - or even December 1949.  Canaan can get some early snow and it holds on longer, and John's color photo looks very much like late-winter in central Connecticut (notice the melting snow patches).

Seeing these two images together, and knowing diesel #0606 would be assigned by April, it looks most likely that John's photo is of one of the last (if not, in fact, the last) runs of steam on the Airline - perhaps January/February 1949.  If that's true, then Leroy's shot is probably of the engine after it left the Airline for a new assignment in Canaan, perhaps as early as Jan/Feb '49 but more likely December of that year.  In any event, my chosen era of Autumn 1947 is well within the period of time the 3022 was used on the Airline local.

If you've read this far, then you likely appreciate the work fun involved in answering the myriad of questions that present themselves when choosing an era and enjoy seeing how all the puzzle pieces fit - once you actually have the pieces in hand, of course.  But as fun as the process can be, the better and more efficient we become, the more authentic our efforts will be.  So if you have any tips or suggestions of methods you think work better, or what's worked well for you, let us know in the comments below!